1. I reviewed the rule of three for writing an EQ.
2. Review the following EQs
A. What is the most important factor in healthy weight loss?
This essential question does tie into all three of the criteria's.
The word, "factor" has a major part as to why it is not just a yes or no question and why it can have alot of research. Not only can you provide an opinion toward what the most important factor is but also source statistical evidence that supports a factor. Sure the answer can be straight to the point, but finding that point will require tons of research and knowledge towards your topic.
- Does this question "take a stance?"
The word "factor" allows for a specific argument as to what they believe (based upon their research) is the best way possible to lose weight. This could be confused with a fact but instead it's an opinion that can lead towards an argument as to what the most important factor is.
Yes it does, because it states what the speaker is going to talk about, gives the audience an idea as to what their topic might be, and how this question can be answered.
B. What is most important to securing a conviction in a criminal investigation?
Wow, talk about grammar issues, so I fixed it for you:
"What is the most important factor towards securing a conviction in a criminal investigation?"
- Does this question provide a "framework for studies?"
Yes it can provide alot of research towards criminal investigation but looking at what the question is asking, the author of the EQ doesn't really know what he will research about in criminal investigation. It isn't a yes or no question but it is still unclear as to what the author will be discussing.
- Does this question "take a stance?"
No it does not because how can you bring up an argument when the EQ has not been completed. In other words, the words, "most important" is incomplete; most important what?
- Does this question provide a clear format?
Of course not, because the formatting is not specific in defining or answering the EQ. Instead you can add the word "factor" or "component" to have a clearer format.
Of course not, because the formatting is not specific in defining or answering the EQ. Instead you can add the word "factor" or "component" to have a clearer format.
C. What is most important in creating a hairstyle that best satisfies a customer?
- Does this question provide a "framework for studies?"
This can provide alot of research due to the answer being an opinion, not a fact. Everyone is different, and not everyone is going to have the same satisfactions. But providing a clue as to what a customer might like will require research and data.
- Does this question "take a stance?"
If the answer is an opinion, then of course their are going to be arguments. So yes it does take a stance.
- Does this question provide a clear format?
Yes. It provides a factor to be answered and clear argument as to what will satisfy a customer.
D. How can an Anesthesiologist best treat chronic pain?
This question does offer a wide variety of studies on how to treat chronic pain, thus the author providing a scientific fact as to why that factor is the best treatment.
- Does this question "take a stance?"
No because the answer cannot be argued upon due to evidence and statistics backing up the authors answer. For example, you can only have a medicine that treats chronic pain in a much better manner and shows statistical evidence as to why it is used by most Anesthesiologists.
- Does this question provide a clear format?
Yes. It is clear and specific as to what the answer could be, which in this case it will be a fact.
No comments:
Post a Comment